dSLR vs. point-and-shoot cameras.

often i hear somebody comparing between a dSLR with a compact point-and-shoot(P&S).
and often i hear some dudes saying how dSLR owns and p&s are lame.

there's no comparing because both cameras are on different levels and for different situations.
really! i mean, do you think a girl would want to stuff a chunky dSLR into her handbag?
let's imagine a situation.
so a woman(let's call her mary) has plans tonight. mary is having a get together dinner at a fancy restaurants with her girls. so she wore make-up, chose a gorgeous dress with a handbag to compliment it.
she stopped for a moment. she wants to take pictures with her friends but her handbag is not that big.
does she:

1. stuff her big dSLR into the small handbag?
2. instead of a handbag, bring a crumpler to fit her dSLR, speedlite and a couple of lens?
3. decides just to bring a small p&s that can fit into her handbag?

for those who chose number 3, congrats! for those who chose 1 and 2, no comment-.-

dudes, stop comparing. a p&s are for those who wants to on vacation and capture some photos without the excess luggage. the quality may not match, but it's a sacrifice that person has made.
to simplify things, a p&s are for those who is not too keen of lugging around a heavy piece of equipment.
it still takes good pictures, it's just that a dslr offers higher quality and more details. that's all.